By submitting this form, you consent to receive emails from FRDM. You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time. For information on how to unsubscribe, as well as our privacy practices and commitment to protecting your privacy, please review our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Stay up-to-date with the latest news on supply chain regulations.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Sanctions checks are applied to suppliers, owners, subsidiaries, board
members, sub-suppliers and other connected entities.
Any company on the UFLPA entity list, the XPCC, or any other companies with known ties to forced labor will be flagged.
Multiple third party databases are leveraged to offer this service including ownership records, shipping records, court records,
media mentions and more.
Benefits of Running Sanctions Checks On Your Suppliers
Companies that engage with sanctioned suppliers may face legal liabilities, reputational risks, and
financial losses. The following are some of the legal hazards that companies need to be aware of
when dealing with sanctioned suppliers:
Violations of Trade Sanctions:
Companies that engage with sanctioned suppliers may violate trade sanctions imposed by governments. These violations can lead to fines, penalties, and even criminal prosecution. For example, the US Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has the power to impose civil and criminal penalties on companies that violate US sanctions laws. Companies that engage with sanctioned suppliers may also face trade restrictions, including the suspension of import and export licenses.
Contractual Liabilities:
Companies that engage with sanctioned suppliers may face contractual liabilities. Contracts may contain provisions that require compliance with sanctions laws, and failure to comply may lead to breach of contract claims by customers or suppliers. In addition, contracts may contain indemnification provisions that require companies to pay damages resulting from a breach of sanctions laws by their suppliers.
Reputational Risks:
Companies that engage with sanctioned suppliers may face reputational risks. Customers, investors, and other stakeholders may view engagement with sanctioned suppliers as evidence of non-compliance with ethical and legal standards. Such negative perceptions can damage a company's reputation and brand, leading to decreased sales and market value.
Financial Losses:
Companies that engage with sanctioned suppliers may face financial losses. Sanctions can lead to the freezing of assets, the imposition of trade restrictions, and the suspension of import and export licenses. Such measures can disrupt supply chains and lead to increased costs and lost revenues.
How It Works
Each supplier gets a score based on FRDM’s supplier diversity risk algorithm along with any assessment information the supplier chooses to provide.
The supplier diversity risk algorithm consists of multiple indicators such as the DEI Country Index and the US Bureau Of Labor Statistics. Each supplier loaded into FRDM gets risk scored for the industry(s) it works in, country(s) it operates in, products or services it provides, and trading partners it does business with (requires Trading Partners Module). In addition FRDM screens for any adverse media involving your supplier related to supplier diversity risk keywords.
Suppliers can be invited  to link to your dashboard via their own SUPPLIER LINK DASHBOARD which allows them to provide relevant certifications, policy assessments, and additional information about diversity practices.

Supplier’s scores change accordingly based on the maturity of their certifications, policies, and additional information. FRDM aggregates all supplier scores into an impact page where you can track progress over time as well as generate reports for external use.
How It Works
FRDM maps upstream commercial relationships and scan each entity for sanctions.
Use Cases For Sanctions Module
The United States has banned products that are connected to supply chains in Xinjiang, China, due to concerns of human rights abuses against Uyghur Muslims in the region. In 2020, the US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) issued Withhold Release Orders (WROs) against certain products originating from Xinjiang, including cotton, tomato products, and hair products, to prevent the import of goods produced with forced labor. The US has also imposed sanctions on Chinese entities and individuals involved in the human rights abuses in Xinjiang, including the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps and the Xinjiang Public Security Bureau. Companies must ensure that their supply chains are free from forced labor and comply with the WROs and sanctions regulations to avoid legal and reputational risks.

Companies must comply with various regulations when engaging with sanctioned suppliers in their supply chain. In the United States, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) administers and enforces economic and trade sanctions based on US foreign policy and national security goals. The OFAC has published guidance for companies on compliance with sanctions laws and recommends that companies conduct due diligence on their suppliers and monitor their activities. The European Union also imposes sanctions on individuals and entities, and companies must comply with the EU's sanctions regulations. The UK's Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) administers and enforces financial sanctions, and companies must comply with UK sanctions laws. In addition, the United Nations imposes sanctions on countries and individuals, and companies must comply with UN sanctions regulations. Overall, companies must be aware of and comply with the relevant sanctions laws and regulations in their jurisdictions and implement effective compliance programs to mitigate legal hazards.
Some Of The Sanctions Currently Monitored
(a full list is available upon request)
Consolidated Australian Sanctions List
Consolidated Canadian Autonomous Sanctions List
EU Financial Sanctions List
Japan Ministry of Finance Economic Sanctions List
Swiss SECO Sanctions List
UK Sanctions List
UN Security Council Sanctions
US OFAC Consolidated Sanctions List
US OFAC Specifically Designated Nationals (SDN) List
Regulatory enforcement actions lists:
Ireland Disqualified/Restricted Persons List
Mexico Government Registry of Sanctioned Providers
Mexico Government Registry of Sanctioned Public Servants
Mexico SAT Article 69-B Non-Compliance Database
Russia Legal Entities with Disqualified Executives
Russian Registry of Disqualified Persons
US FINRA Barred Individuals
US HHS LEIE Database
US SAM.gov Entity Exclusions Database
Supply chain screening data
US CBP Withhold Release Orders and Findings Database
US Department of Commerce BIS MEU List
US Consolidated Screening List
US DHS Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act List
US NDAA 1237 List
US NDAA 1260H List
Additional Risk Factors
Forced Labor Risk
Direct Trade History with WRO Entity
Direct Trading History with Xinjiang Entities
Entity Located in Xinjiang
Keywords Found in Company Attributes
Owned by Xinjiang-based entity
Owner of Xinjiang-based entity
Subtier Trade History with WRO Entity
Subtier Trading History with Xinjiang Entities
XPCC Contractors
Xinjiang Operations
Former Sanctions
Owned by Sanctioned Entity
Owned by State Owned Enterprise
Owned by WRO Entity
Owner of Entity Subject to Regulatory Action
Owner of Entity in Export Controls List
Owner of Forced Labor Risk Entity (Xinjiang Import Controls Designation)
Politically Exposed Person
Possibly the Same as Entity with Forced Labor Risk (Entity Located in Xinjiang)
Possibly the Same as Entity with Forced Labor Risk (Xinjiang Operations)
Possibly the Same as State-Owned Enterprise
Possibly the Same as a Politically Exposed Person
Possibly the Same as a WRO Entity
Possibly the Same as an Entity Subject to Regulatory Action
Regulatory Action
State Owned Enterprise
Related to PEP
Related to Sanctioned
Related to WRO Entity
Terrorism (from Adverse Media)
Basel AML
Corruption Perceptions Index
EU High-Risk Third Countries

Are you located in Europe?

Stay up-to-date with the latest news on supply chain regulations.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.